Skip to main content
critic Megadoc (2025)

Megadoc Review: Coppola's Obsession, Unfiltered

★★★½☆ 3.7/5

Verdict

Essential for anyone who cares how movies get made.

Is Megadoc good?

Yes — Megadoc is a sharply assembled documentary that earns its acclaim, even if it doesn’t fully win over casual audiences. Its Critic Score sits at a lofty 98, reflecting near-unanimous praise for Mike Figgis’s access and control of the material, while the Audience Score of 65 and a Metascore of 73 suggest a more divided reception once you leave the critical bubble. Letterboxd (3.4) and IMDb (6.9) land somewhere in between, painting a picture of a film that specialists rate far more highly than general viewers.

What is Megadoc about?

Megadoc follows Francis Ford Coppola through the long, turbulent creation of his self-financed passion project, Megalopolis. Shot fly-on-the-wall style over the course of production, the documentary trails Coppola from early ambition through the countless complications of independently bankrolling an epic on his own terms. Figgis threads in the people orbiting the production — including Eleanor Coppola and Adam Driver — to build a portrait less about the finished film than about the obsession and risk required to make it at all.

Should you watch Megadoc?

If you have any interest in how ambitious films actually get made, yes — this is one of the more clear-eyed production documentaries in recent memory. The gap between its Critic Score and Audience Score is worth noting: viewers without an existing stake in Coppola or Megalopolis may find the film’s inside-baseball focus less rewarding than critics did. But for anyone drawn to the mechanics of filmmaking, financing, and creative ego, Megadoc delivers a candid, unglamorized look that’s hard to find elsewhere.

How does Megadoc compare to Hearts of Darkness?

Megadoc sits comfortably alongside Hearts of Darkness: A Filmmaker’s Apocalypse, the classic chronicle of Coppola’s chaotic shoot for Apocalypse Now. Both films catch Coppola mid-gamble, betting his own resources and reputation on a project many around him doubted, and both find their tension in the space between visionary ambition and on-the-ground disorder. Where Hearts of Darkness had the benefit of decades of hindsight and mythology, Megadoc is working in real time, capturing a director in his eighties still willing to risk everything on a single vision — which gives it a rawer, less settled quality than its predecessor, even if it hasn’t yet earned the same legendary status.